406016100119

Name: 406016100119
SKU: 406016100119

BLADE

OEM

Specifications

Part Number: 406016100119
Manufacturer: Bell
ATA ChapterMaintenance system chapter: 64 — Tail RotorField reports: 64 (100%) — 33 reports
CapabilitySystem area (hydraulics, avionics, landing gear…): Structures
Inventory ClassRotable, expendable, or consumable: Rotable
Certification: OEM
Aircraft Category: General-Aviation
Criticality: Critical & Life-Limited

Service Reliabilityfrom FAA SDR (Service Difficulty Reports)

96%

Scrap Propensity (SDR-derived)

high confidence

SDR reports: 33
Replace events: 24
Repair events: 1
K-code events: 25

Reporting window 1997-06-13 – 2025-05-08Dominant chapter ATA 64

Directional indicator only. Reflects what operators reported to the FAA when a difficulty was logged — not a fleet-normalized failure rate or a cost-based BER. Use alongside operator-specific data.

Airworthiness Directive coverage

FAA / EASA public regulatory data

1directive references this part number — recurring compliance demand wherever it flies

Most recent

FAAAD 2023-17-51effective Sep 21, 2023Mixed actions
The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all Bell Textron Canada Limited Model 407 helicopters. The FAA previously sent this AD as an emergency AD to all known U.S. owners and operators of these helicopters. This AD was prompted by a report of a disbonded area in a tail rotor (T/R) blade. This AD requires determining if an affected T/R blade is installed, inspecting each of those T/R blades and, depending on the results, replacing the T/R blade as specified in a Transport Canada emergency AD, which is incorporated by reference. This AD also limits the installation of T/R blades to certain T/R blades. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

Directives citing this part number in the FAA / EASA regulatory corpus we have processed — not a complete historical AD list. An AD is a compliance requirement that drives scheduled work (inspections, replacements, modifications) on the fleets that carry the part; a directive naming this PN as the replacement part is install demand, not an action against it — and none of this is a prediction that the part will fail.