Boeing 757

51,126 parts applicable to this airframe — narrowbody

Part NumberStatus
112N3302OEM
113N200347OEM
113N33709OEM
114N4001OEM
140N25055OEM
141N78352OEM
143N3324OEM
143N50676OEM
144N5001OEM
144N53611OEM
144N536125OEM
144N536128OEM
144N536157OEM
144N80234OEM
144N81403OEM
144N814034OEM
144N8140U4OEM
144N8140U44OEM
144N8140U49OEM
144N818055OEM
144N818057OEM
146N3810OEM
146N51846OEM
146N5240Y22OEM
146N530096OEM
146N54519OEM
146N7126OEM
146N8326U2OEM
146N853018OEM
146V51491OEM
149N713029OEM
149N75392OEM
149N755113OEM
149N77236OEM
149N77382OEM
212N308029OEM
271N61442OEM
284N1038176OEM
284N17052OEM
287N490335OEM
314N3210U167OEM
453180137OEM
453180139OEM
453180189OEM
453N180131OEM
453N180154OEM
654N024312OEM
65595953OEM
707585BOEM
9R33421OEM

Utilization & cargo trend(US carriers, 2015–2025)

757 family rollup — BTS T-100, domestic + international

Cycles per aircraft
5092025
2015: 532 cycles/aircraft2016: 496 cycles/aircraft2017: 486 cycles/aircraft2018: 541 cycles/aircraft2019: 583 cycles/aircraft2020: 372 cycles/aircraft2021: 446 cycles/aircraft2022: 490 cycles/aircraft2023: 549 cycles/aircraft2024: 533 cycles/aircraft2025: 509 cycles/aircraft
20152025
2020 trough: 372
Recovered to 91% of 2019 (2024 vs 2019)
Freighter share of departures
21%30%20152025
2015: 20.8% freighter share2016: 25.4% freighter share2017: 28.4% freighter share2018: 29.9% freighter share2019: 29.3% freighter share2020: 48.8% freighter share2021: 42.3% freighter share2022: 37.1% freighter share2023: 28.2% freighter share2024: 25.4% freighter share2025: 29.8% freighter share
20152025
Est. US-registered fleet
4492025
20152025

US carriers only (BTS T-100, domestic + international segments) — foreign-carrier flying is excluded, so global utilization runs higher. Fleet size is reconstructed from the FAA registry (built on or before each year, not yet deregistered) — an approximation. Freighter share counts departures with zero passengers and freight aboard — a proxy for freighter/combi operations, not a tail-by-tail conversion count. Missing years render as gaps.

USM supply — retirements & teardowns(20232026)

757 family — FAA registry deregistrations

Left the US registry
55aircraft
Stayed domestic
44vs 11 exported
Avg age at retirement
28.9years
Still US-registered
449aircraft
Where this family's parts catalog concentrates — the systems most exposed to incoming teardown supply

FAA registry data. Domestic deregistration is a teardown proxy — it also captures re-registrations and some unflagged exports, so it is not a confirmed part-out count; exported aircraft left the US fleet intact and are not USM supply. ATA shares reflect where this directory's parts for the family concentrate (parts in parentheses) — a coverage signal, not the aircraft's bill of materials or a teardown-yield forecast.

Engine-program supply pressure(since 2023)

FAA registry — US-registered fleet

Engines account for roughly half of all MRO spend, so engine programs shedding aircraft are where retirement supply carries the most value.

Engine modelActive tailsEngine unitsRetired since ’23ExportedAvg age at dereg
CFM INTL. CFM56 series7091,4261741325.4 yr
P & W PW203711523022029.4 yr
ROLLS-ROYC RB-211 series18637215828.6 yr
P & W PW20408817811030.7 yr
ROLLS-ROYC TAY MK 610-849983332 yr
ROLLS-ROYC DART RDA-107142122 yr
ROLLS-ROYC RB211-535E4376121228.7 yr
P & W PW2037(M)121030 yr

FAA registry data, US-registered aircraft only. Counts reflect the engine model as registered — generic “series” rows coexist with thrust-variant rows, so per-variant figures are partial. Retired = domestic deregistrations (a teardown proxy, not a confirmed part-out); exported aircraft left the US fleet intact. Active tails span every family the engine flies on, not just this one.

Maintenance economics(US carriers, through 2026)

757 family — BTS Form 41 filings

Direct maintenance per block hour
$448fleet avg
Airframe / engine split
$241/$207
Reporting carriers
7
Carrier range
$239$1,198

BTS Form 41 data (Schedule P-5.2 maintenance expense over T-2 block hours), Group III US carriers only — filers above $1B annual revenue; smaller US operators, Part 135, and all non-US carriers are not in this data. Dollars are accrual-basis from regulatory filings (reserves and depreciation included), so they benchmark fleet economics and do not track to individual repair events. Averages are block-hour- weighted across every reporting carrier; the range spans per-carrier rates after excluding marginal reporting slices, and small carrier counts are noisy.

Airworthiness Directive activity

FAA / EASA public regulatory data

28airworthiness directives affecting this fleet — recurring compliance demand for the parts and shops that serve it
Most recent
  • FAA AD 2026-13-16effective Jul 1, 2026Prohibition

    The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all The Boeing Company Model 757 airplanes and Model 767 airplanes. This AD was prompted by the determination that radio altimeters cannot be relied upon to perform their intended function if they experience interference from wireless broadband operations in the 3.7-3.98 GHz frequency band (5G Lower C-Band) while operating in Canadian airspace, and a determination that, during approach, landings, and go-arounds, as a result of this interference, certain airplane systems may not properly function, resulting in increased flightcrew workload while on approach with the flight director, autothrottle, or autopilot engaged, which could result in reduced ability of the flightcrew to maintain safe flight and landing of the airplane. This AD requires revising the existing airplane flight manual (AFM) to incorporate limitations prohibiting certain operations requiring radio altimeter data when operating in Canadian airspace. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

  • FAA AD 2026-08-09effective Jun 3, 2026Mixed actions

    The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model 757-200 and -300 series airplanes. This AD was prompted by a determination that new or more restrictive airworthiness limitations are necessary. This AD requires revising the existing maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate new or more restrictive airworthiness limitations. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

  • FAA AD 2026-04-06effective Feb 26, 2026Mixed actions

    The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model 757-200 and -300 series airplanes. This AD was prompted by reported crack findings on airplanes with scimitar blended winglets. This AD requires inspections for cracks, and repair as applicable. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

  • FAA AD 2026-01-05effective Feb 20, 2026Mixed actions

    The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model 757-200 and -300 series airplanes. This AD was prompted by cracking found during an inspection on an airplane equipped with Aviation Partners Boeing (APB) scimitar blended winglets. This AD requires performing a general visual inspection (GVI) or maintenance records check of certain stringers for an approved freeze plug repair, performing a high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspection of the same area for any crack common to a certain stringer and a reinforcement strap, and applicable on-condition actions. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

  • FAA AD 2025-23-03effective Jan 13, 2026Mixed actions

    The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model 757 airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports of precoolers that failed due to a wear-out condition, combined with latently failed overheat detection thermal switches. This AD requires an inspection for heat damage on the engine strut structure, repetitive tests of the thermal switch temperature and ground wires, replacement of the precooler on Model 757-300 airplanes, and applicable on-condition actions. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

Directives linked to this airframe family in the FAA / EASA regulatory corpus we have processed — not a complete historical AD list. An AD is a compliance requirement that drives scheduled work (inspections, replacements, modifications) across the fleet; inspection directives are not replacement directives, and none of this is a prediction that any part will fail.