McDonnell Douglas MD-82

15,363 parts applicable to this airframe — narrowbody

Part NumberStatus
143N101453OEM
143N101928OEM
143N102636OEM
143N3110140OEM
143N3110353OEM
143N3110387389OEM
143N31213OEM
143N31512OEM
143N33241OEM
143N3411U126OEM
143N35801OEM
143N36232OEM
143N36501OEM
143N3750OEM
143N5002OEM
143N500814OEM
143N5014
143N5106OEM
143N51209OEM
143N51221OEM
143N51291OEM
143N5276OEM
143N52761OEM
143N534515OEM
143N534538OEM
143N5346OEM
143N535457OEM
143N535458OEM
143N536678OEM
143N536728OEM
143N53903OEM
143N5412OEM
143N5457101OEM
143N545734OEM
143N545781OEM
143N545785OEM
143N545789OEM
143N55221OEM
143N55531OEM
143N581215OEM
143N61002004OEM
143N610417OEM
143N6603105OEM
143N6603223OEM
143N660355OEM
143N66213OEM
143N8230OEM
143N83128OEM
143N833826OEM
143N833826UALOEM

Utilization & cargo trend(US carriers, 2015–2025)

MD-80 family rollup — BTS T-100, domestic + international

Cycles per aircraft
752025
2015: 809 cycles/aircraft2016: 734 cycles/aircraft2017: 739 cycles/aircraft2018: 778 cycles/aircraft2019: 613 cycles/aircraft2020: 124 cycles/aircraft2021: 35 cycles/aircraft2022: 53 cycles/aircraft2023: 58 cycles/aircraft2024: 86 cycles/aircraft2025: 75 cycles/aircraft
20152025
2020: 124
Recovered to 14% of 2019 (2024 vs 2019)
Freighter share of departures
1%44%20152025
2015: 1.2% freighter share2016: 1.2% freighter share2017: 1.5% freighter share2018: 1.7% freighter share2019: 2.3% freighter share2020: 14.2% freighter share2021: 60.2% freighter share2022: 62.4% freighter share2023: 54.3% freighter share2024: 37.6% freighter share2025: 43.5% freighter share
20152025
Est. US-registered fleet
1202025
20152025

US carriers only (BTS T-100, domestic + international segments) — foreign-carrier flying is excluded, so global utilization runs higher. Fleet size is reconstructed from the FAA registry (built on or before each year, not yet deregistered) — an approximation. Freighter share counts departures with zero passengers and freight aboard — a proxy for freighter/combi operations, not a tail-by-tail conversion count. Missing years render as gaps.

USM supply — retirements & teardowns(20232026)

MD-80 family — FAA registry deregistrations

Left the US registry
49aircraft
Stayed domestic
42vs 7 exported
Avg age at retirement
38.3years
Still US-registered
119aircraft
Where this family's parts catalog concentrates — the systems most exposed to incoming teardown supply

FAA registry data. Domestic deregistration is a teardown proxy — it also captures re-registrations and some unflagged exports, so it is not a confirmed part-out count; exported aircraft left the US fleet intact and are not USM supply. ATA shares reflect where this directory's parts for the family concentrate (parts in parentheses) — a coverage signal, not the aircraft's bill of materials or a teardown-yield forecast.

Engine-program supply pressure(since 2023)

FAA registry — US-registered fleet

Engines account for roughly half of all MRO spend, so engine programs shedding aircraft are where retirement supply carries the most value.

Engine modelActive tailsEngine unitsRetired since ’23ExportedAvg age at dereg
P & W JT8D series8417229834.4 yr
P & W JT8D-21922444034.5 yr
P & W JT8D-9 series9244253.8 yr
P & W JT9D series13373041.7 yr
P & W JT8D-18213033 yr
P & W JT8D-17 series7161144 yr
P & W JT8D-156131151 yr
P & W JT8D-9A51100

FAA registry data, US-registered aircraft only. Counts reflect the engine model as registered — generic “series” rows coexist with thrust-variant rows, so per-variant figures are partial. Retired = domestic deregistrations (a teardown proxy, not a confirmed part-out); exported aircraft left the US fleet intact. Active tails span every family the engine flies on, not just this one.

Maintenance economics(US carriers, through 2026)

MD-80 family — BTS Form 41 filings

Direct maintenance per block hour
$471fleet avg
Airframe / engine split
$432/$39
Reporting carriers
3

BTS Form 41 data (Schedule P-5.2 maintenance expense over T-2 block hours), Group III US carriers only — filers above $1B annual revenue; smaller US operators, Part 135, and all non-US carriers are not in this data. Dollars are accrual-basis from regulatory filings (reserves and depreciation included), so they benchmark fleet economics and do not track to individual repair events. Averages are block-hour- weighted across every reporting carrier; the range spans per-carrier rates after excluding marginal reporting slices, and small carrier counts are noisy.

Airworthiness Directive activity

FAA / EASA public regulatory data

2airworthiness directives affecting this fleet — recurring compliance demand for the parts and shops that serve it
Most recent
  • FAA AD 2025-09-11effective Jun 12, 2025Prohibition

    The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all The Boeing Company Model DC-9-81 (MD-81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-83 (MD- 83), DC 9-87 (MD-87), and MD-88 airplanes, and Model DC-9-10, DC-9-20, DC-9-30, DC-9-40, and DC-9-50 series airplanes. This AD was prompted by the discovery of jammed elevators during takeoff. This AD requires revising the "Certificate Limitations" section of the existing airplane flight manual (AFM) to include a procedure to confirm elevator surfaces are not jammed in the trailing edge down (TED) position. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

  • FAA AD 2023-01-13effective Mar 13, 2023Mixed actions

    The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model DC-9-81 (MD-81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC- 9-83 (MD-83), and DC-9-87 (MD-87) airplanes; and Model MD-88 airplanes. This AD was prompted by an evaluation by the design approval holder (DAH) indicating that certain center wing lower stringers are subject to widespread fatigue damage (WFD). WFD analysis found that fatigue cracks could grow to a critical length after the structural modification point (SMP) for these center wing lower stringers. This AD requires replacing certain left and right side center wing lower stringers. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

Directives linked to this airframe family in the FAA / EASA regulatory corpus we have processed — not a complete historical AD list. An AD is a compliance requirement that drives scheduled work (inspections, replacements, modifications) across the fleet; inspection directives are not replacement directives, and none of this is a prediction that any part will fail.