McDonnell Douglas MD-82

15,363 parts applicable to this airframe — narrowbody

Part NumberStatus
146T10705OEM
146T12114OEM
146T121322OEM
146T1215OEM
146T121828OEM
146T12233OEM
146T3001252OEM
146T3001470OEM
146T3002114OEM
146T3002171OEM
146T300310OEM
146T3003212OEM
146T300335OEM
146T300564OEM
146T300624OEM
146T32101OEM
146T32121OEM
146T32481OEM
146T32482OEM
146T32581OEM
146T32613OEM
146T35328OEM
146T5004106OEM
146T500426OEM
146T50063OEM
146T50081OEM
146T500810OEM
146T51173OEM
146T51453OEM
146T52138OEM
146T52144OEM
146T53222OEM
146T560967OEM
146T562822OEM
146T56491OEM
146T56492OEM
146T56497OEM
146T56498OEM
146T56518146T565OEM
146T5869131OEM
146T5869134OEM
146T5869136OEM
146T5869153OEM
146T5869154OEM
146T5869U107OEM
146T6334OEM
146T80473OEM
146T82111OEM
146T8510OEM
146T85214OEM

Utilization & cargo trend(US carriers, 2015–2025)

MD-80 family rollup — BTS T-100, domestic + international

Cycles per aircraft
752025
2015: 809 cycles/aircraft2016: 734 cycles/aircraft2017: 739 cycles/aircraft2018: 778 cycles/aircraft2019: 613 cycles/aircraft2020: 124 cycles/aircraft2021: 35 cycles/aircraft2022: 53 cycles/aircraft2023: 58 cycles/aircraft2024: 86 cycles/aircraft2025: 75 cycles/aircraft
20152025
2020: 124
Recovered to 14% of 2019 (2024 vs 2019)
Freighter share of departures
1%44%20152025
2015: 1.2% freighter share2016: 1.2% freighter share2017: 1.5% freighter share2018: 1.7% freighter share2019: 2.3% freighter share2020: 14.2% freighter share2021: 60.2% freighter share2022: 62.4% freighter share2023: 54.3% freighter share2024: 37.6% freighter share2025: 43.5% freighter share
20152025
Est. US-registered fleet
1202025
20152025

US carriers only (BTS T-100, domestic + international segments) — foreign-carrier flying is excluded, so global utilization runs higher. Fleet size is reconstructed from the FAA registry (built on or before each year, not yet deregistered) — an approximation. Freighter share counts departures with zero passengers and freight aboard — a proxy for freighter/combi operations, not a tail-by-tail conversion count. Missing years render as gaps.

USM supply — retirements & teardowns(20232026)

MD-80 family — FAA registry deregistrations

Left the US registry
49aircraft
Stayed domestic
42vs 7 exported
Avg age at retirement
38.3years
Still US-registered
119aircraft
Where this family's parts catalog concentrates — the systems most exposed to incoming teardown supply

FAA registry data. Domestic deregistration is a teardown proxy — it also captures re-registrations and some unflagged exports, so it is not a confirmed part-out count; exported aircraft left the US fleet intact and are not USM supply. ATA shares reflect where this directory's parts for the family concentrate (parts in parentheses) — a coverage signal, not the aircraft's bill of materials or a teardown-yield forecast.

Engine-program supply pressure(since 2023)

FAA registry — US-registered fleet

Engines account for roughly half of all MRO spend, so engine programs shedding aircraft are where retirement supply carries the most value.

Engine modelActive tailsEngine unitsRetired since ’23ExportedAvg age at dereg
P & W JT8D series8417229834.4 yr
P & W JT8D-21922444034.5 yr
P & W JT8D-9 series9244253.8 yr
P & W JT9D series13373041.7 yr
P & W JT8D-18213033 yr
P & W JT8D-17 series7161144 yr
P & W JT8D-156131151 yr
P & W JT8D-9A51100

FAA registry data, US-registered aircraft only. Counts reflect the engine model as registered — generic “series” rows coexist with thrust-variant rows, so per-variant figures are partial. Retired = domestic deregistrations (a teardown proxy, not a confirmed part-out); exported aircraft left the US fleet intact. Active tails span every family the engine flies on, not just this one.

Maintenance economics(US carriers, through 2026)

MD-80 family — BTS Form 41 filings

Direct maintenance per block hour
$471fleet avg
Airframe / engine split
$432/$39
Reporting carriers
3

BTS Form 41 data (Schedule P-5.2 maintenance expense over T-2 block hours), Group III US carriers only — filers above $1B annual revenue; smaller US operators, Part 135, and all non-US carriers are not in this data. Dollars are accrual-basis from regulatory filings (reserves and depreciation included), so they benchmark fleet economics and do not track to individual repair events. Averages are block-hour- weighted across every reporting carrier; the range spans per-carrier rates after excluding marginal reporting slices, and small carrier counts are noisy.

Airworthiness Directive activity

FAA / EASA public regulatory data

2airworthiness directives affecting this fleet — recurring compliance demand for the parts and shops that serve it
Most recent
  • FAA AD 2025-09-11effective Jun 12, 2025Prohibition

    The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all The Boeing Company Model DC-9-81 (MD-81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-83 (MD- 83), DC 9-87 (MD-87), and MD-88 airplanes, and Model DC-9-10, DC-9-20, DC-9-30, DC-9-40, and DC-9-50 series airplanes. This AD was prompted by the discovery of jammed elevators during takeoff. This AD requires revising the "Certificate Limitations" section of the existing airplane flight manual (AFM) to include a procedure to confirm elevator surfaces are not jammed in the trailing edge down (TED) position. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

  • FAA AD 2023-01-13effective Mar 13, 2023Mixed actions

    The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model DC-9-81 (MD-81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC- 9-83 (MD-83), and DC-9-87 (MD-87) airplanes; and Model MD-88 airplanes. This AD was prompted by an evaluation by the design approval holder (DAH) indicating that certain center wing lower stringers are subject to widespread fatigue damage (WFD). WFD analysis found that fatigue cracks could grow to a critical length after the structural modification point (SMP) for these center wing lower stringers. This AD requires replacing certain left and right side center wing lower stringers. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

Directives linked to this airframe family in the FAA / EASA regulatory corpus we have processed — not a complete historical AD list. An AD is a compliance requirement that drives scheduled work (inspections, replacements, modifications) across the fleet; inspection directives are not replacement directives, and none of this is a prediction that any part will fail.