Boeing 757

51,126 parts applicable to this airframe — narrowbody

Part NumberStatus
1051-003PMA
1051001PMA
4032-011PMA
4032-105PMA
4037-002PMA
4037-005PMA
4041-001PMA
4043-003AWPMA
4114-039PMA
4119-001PMA
4140-010CPMA
4152-203UPMA
4186-046PMA
7025-401PMA
7025-402PMA
7025-440PMA
7099-404PMA
7099-405PMA
7099-412PMA
7103-401PMA
7951-001PMA
8110-028PMA
8160-413PMA
8168-406PMA
8195-006PMA
8209-001PMA
8214-406PMA
8220-003PMA
8262-109PMA
8262-264PMA
8286-403PMA
8306-203PMA
8306-401PMA
8306-405PMA
8306-406PMA
8307-009PMA
8316-109PMA
8326-402PMA
8327-202PMA
8327-203PMA
8327-204PMA
8425-001PMA
8427-047PMA
8455-403PMA
8466-001PMA
8470-403PMA
8470-413PMA
8531-005PMA
8994-010PMA
9520-002PMA

Utilization & cargo trend(US carriers, 2015–2025)

757 family rollup — BTS T-100, domestic + international

Cycles per aircraft
5092025
2015: 532 cycles/aircraft2016: 496 cycles/aircraft2017: 486 cycles/aircraft2018: 541 cycles/aircraft2019: 583 cycles/aircraft2020: 372 cycles/aircraft2021: 446 cycles/aircraft2022: 490 cycles/aircraft2023: 549 cycles/aircraft2024: 533 cycles/aircraft2025: 509 cycles/aircraft
20152025
2020 trough: 372
Recovered to 91% of 2019 (2024 vs 2019)
Freighter share of departures
21%30%20152025
2015: 20.8% freighter share2016: 25.4% freighter share2017: 28.4% freighter share2018: 29.9% freighter share2019: 29.3% freighter share2020: 48.8% freighter share2021: 42.3% freighter share2022: 37.1% freighter share2023: 28.2% freighter share2024: 25.4% freighter share2025: 29.8% freighter share
20152025
Est. US-registered fleet
4492025
20152025

US carriers only (BTS T-100, domestic + international segments) — foreign-carrier flying is excluded, so global utilization runs higher. Fleet size is reconstructed from the FAA registry (built on or before each year, not yet deregistered) — an approximation. Freighter share counts departures with zero passengers and freight aboard — a proxy for freighter/combi operations, not a tail-by-tail conversion count. Missing years render as gaps.

USM supply — retirements & teardowns(20232026)

757 family — FAA registry deregistrations

Left the US registry
55aircraft
Stayed domestic
44vs 11 exported
Avg age at retirement
28.9years
Still US-registered
449aircraft
Where this family's parts catalog concentrates — the systems most exposed to incoming teardown supply

FAA registry data. Domestic deregistration is a teardown proxy — it also captures re-registrations and some unflagged exports, so it is not a confirmed part-out count; exported aircraft left the US fleet intact and are not USM supply. ATA shares reflect where this directory's parts for the family concentrate (parts in parentheses) — a coverage signal, not the aircraft's bill of materials or a teardown-yield forecast.

Engine-program supply pressure(since 2023)

FAA registry — US-registered fleet

Engines account for roughly half of all MRO spend, so engine programs shedding aircraft are where retirement supply carries the most value.

Engine modelActive tailsEngine unitsRetired since ’23ExportedAvg age at dereg
CFM INTL. CFM56 series7091,4261741325.4 yr
P & W PW203711523022029.4 yr
ROLLS-ROYC RB-211 series18637215828.6 yr
P & W PW20408817811030.7 yr
ROLLS-ROYC TAY MK 610-849983332 yr
ROLLS-ROYC DART RDA-107142122 yr
ROLLS-ROYC RB211-535E4376121228.7 yr
P & W PW2037(M)121030 yr

FAA registry data, US-registered aircraft only. Counts reflect the engine model as registered — generic “series” rows coexist with thrust-variant rows, so per-variant figures are partial. Retired = domestic deregistrations (a teardown proxy, not a confirmed part-out); exported aircraft left the US fleet intact. Active tails span every family the engine flies on, not just this one.

Maintenance economics(US carriers, through 2026)

757 family — BTS Form 41 filings

Direct maintenance per block hour
$448fleet avg
Airframe / engine split
$241/$207
Reporting carriers
7
Carrier range
$239$1,198

BTS Form 41 data (Schedule P-5.2 maintenance expense over T-2 block hours), Group III US carriers only — filers above $1B annual revenue; smaller US operators, Part 135, and all non-US carriers are not in this data. Dollars are accrual-basis from regulatory filings (reserves and depreciation included), so they benchmark fleet economics and do not track to individual repair events. Averages are block-hour- weighted across every reporting carrier; the range spans per-carrier rates after excluding marginal reporting slices, and small carrier counts are noisy.

Airworthiness Directive activity

FAA / EASA public regulatory data

28airworthiness directives affecting this fleet — recurring compliance demand for the parts and shops that serve it
Most recent
  • FAA AD 2026-13-16effective Jul 1, 2026Prohibition

    The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all The Boeing Company Model 757 airplanes and Model 767 airplanes. This AD was prompted by the determination that radio altimeters cannot be relied upon to perform their intended function if they experience interference from wireless broadband operations in the 3.7-3.98 GHz frequency band (5G Lower C-Band) while operating in Canadian airspace, and a determination that, during approach, landings, and go-arounds, as a result of this interference, certain airplane systems may not properly function, resulting in increased flightcrew workload while on approach with the flight director, autothrottle, or autopilot engaged, which could result in reduced ability of the flightcrew to maintain safe flight and landing of the airplane. This AD requires revising the existing airplane flight manual (AFM) to incorporate limitations prohibiting certain operations requiring radio altimeter data when operating in Canadian airspace. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

  • FAA AD 2026-08-09effective Jun 3, 2026Mixed actions

    The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model 757-200 and -300 series airplanes. This AD was prompted by a determination that new or more restrictive airworthiness limitations are necessary. This AD requires revising the existing maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate new or more restrictive airworthiness limitations. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

  • FAA AD 2026-04-06effective Feb 26, 2026Mixed actions

    The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model 757-200 and -300 series airplanes. This AD was prompted by reported crack findings on airplanes with scimitar blended winglets. This AD requires inspections for cracks, and repair as applicable. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

  • FAA AD 2026-01-05effective Feb 20, 2026Mixed actions

    The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model 757-200 and -300 series airplanes. This AD was prompted by cracking found during an inspection on an airplane equipped with Aviation Partners Boeing (APB) scimitar blended winglets. This AD requires performing a general visual inspection (GVI) or maintenance records check of certain stringers for an approved freeze plug repair, performing a high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspection of the same area for any crack common to a certain stringer and a reinforcement strap, and applicable on-condition actions. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

  • FAA AD 2025-23-03effective Jan 13, 2026Mixed actions

    The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model 757 airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports of precoolers that failed due to a wear-out condition, combined with latently failed overheat detection thermal switches. This AD requires an inspection for heat damage on the engine strut structure, repetitive tests of the thermal switch temperature and ground wires, replacement of the precooler on Model 757-300 airplanes, and applicable on-condition actions. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

Directives linked to this airframe family in the FAA / EASA regulatory corpus we have processed — not a complete historical AD list. An AD is a compliance requirement that drives scheduled work (inspections, replacements, modifications) across the fleet; inspection directives are not replacement directives, and none of this is a prediction that any part will fail.